[MINC-users] emma

[Jason Lerch]

Greetings,

the deafening silence to your appeals would indicate that nobody is 
actively supporting EMMA at this point. In my opinion it should be 
taken behind the shed and shot, as it is one horrible bit of code 
designed for matlab 4, which was quite a limited language (if my 
knowledge of EMMA history is correct).

It looks like you are mostly on your own. If you are really stuck I can 
wander by at some point to see if I can come up with anything obvious, 
but I have never compiled EMMA under any platform and don't have matlab 
on my mac to try it here.

Sorry ...

Jason


On Mar 9, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Jeff ATKINSON wrote:

> Is anyone maintaining emma right now.
>
> I am still having trouble getting it to compile on OS X with Matlab 
> 6.5.1.
> The header files mex.h, matrix.h are somewhat different in the latest
> version.
>
> I also wondered whether the old code was completely gcc 3.3 compliant 
> as I
> get different errors when I use gcc3 vs gcc3.3, however I have no 
> trouble
> compling emma on SHADOW with gcc 3.3.
>
> I have managed to get the c files (miwriteimages etc) to compile by
> stealing the old headers from matlab 6.1 on the IRIX system but I 
> still can't get the mex files to
> compile at all.
>
> If anyone is maintaining emma, or if anyone has had any success 
> compiling
> it with 6.5.1 on OS X -- I would appreciate the help.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jeff Atkinson
>
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users@bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users