[MINC-development] Is MINC1 still used?

[Steve M. Robbins]

On August 23, 2015 11:43:03 AM Steve M. Robbins wrote:

> [...] note that tests only fail if I enable MINC1 support (which is off
> by default).  Without MINC1 there are no failures.

So this prompts the question: should I care?  Would anyone be inconvenienced 
if Debian's MINC only supported MINC2?

I don't personally use MINC at all these days (though if I did go back to look 
at my old datasets they will all be MINC1, so I would miss MINC1 support if it 
were lacking).

For the rest of the world, though: would they miss it?  Are the datasets -- 
like the standard BIC templates, or atlases -- distributed in MINC1 format?

Thanks,
-Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/pipermail/minc-development/attachments/20150823/aeae64f4/attachment.pgp>