[MINC-development] Is MINC1 still used?

[Vladimir S. Fonov]

Hello,

On 15-08-23 12:52 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On August 23, 2015 11:43:03 AM Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
>> [...] note that tests only fail if I enable MINC1 support (which is off
>> by default).  Without MINC1 there are no failures.
>
> So this prompts the question: should I care?  Would anyone be inconvenienced
> if Debian's MINC only supported MINC2?

Unfortunately you will not be able to compile most of minc tools without 
MINC1 support, since they use MINC1 api which is strongly NETCDF dependent.




> I don't personally use MINC at all these days (though if I did go back to look
> at my old datasets they will all be MINC1, so I would miss MINC1 support if it
> were lacking).
>
> For the rest of the world, though: would they miss it?  Are the datasets --
> like the standard BIC templates, or atlases -- distributed in MINC1 format?
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-development mailing list
> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
>