[MINC-development] mincpik

[Peter NEELIN]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Andrew Janke wrote:

> Peter expressed a (fairly good) reason for this a while back to me.  He thinks
> it shouldn't be included as it then brings perl into the base minc distro.

Times have changed, perl is fairly ubiquitous, perhaps it is time to drop
that rule... Also, with a couple of eager packagers, the configuration
could be made to do the work of figuring out where perl lives (if
anywhere) and do the right thing. On the other hand, perhaps a separate
package of minc extras might make it easier for those only interested in
"core" minc. Thoughts, Steve?

            Peter
----
            Peter Neelin (neelin@bic.mni.mcgill.ca)