[MINC-users] mincnlm
Louis Dieumegarde
louis.dieumegarde at crulrg.ulaval.ca
Tue May 22 09:43:00 EDT 2018
It works! Thank you.
Louis Dieumegarde
On 2018-05-17, 12:00 PM, "minc-users-bounces at bic.mni.mcgill.ca on behalf of minc-users-request at bic.mni.mcgill.ca" <minc-users-bounces at bic.mni.mcgill.ca on behalf of minc-users-request at bic.mni.mcgill.ca> wrote:
Send MINC-users mailing list submissions to
minc-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
minc-users-request at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
You can reach the person managing the list at
minc-users-owner at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of MINC-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. mincnlm (Louis Dieumegarde)
2. Re: mincnlm (Vladimir S. FONOV)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 18:01:25 +0000
From: Louis Dieumegarde <louis.dieumegarde at crulrg.ulaval.ca>
To: "minc-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca" <minc-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca>
Subject: [MINC-users] mincnlm
Message-ID: <19E0E680-E0BC-4BA7-B3FC-54E0D5CE5ED0 at ulaval.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Bonjour,
We have a problem when using the mincnlm tool with mri_convert. Once
the denoised minc file is convert to MGZ, we have an intensity range of
-32768 to 32767.
I tried the no_scale flag without success. I tried the -odt flag, the
range become 0-255, but there is still the wide disparity between some
voxels in the lower vs upper range.
The denoised minc is ok when we use register or mincstats. Even when we
open directly the denoised minc in freeview, the problem appears.
Is there a conversion in the denoised tool that is not compatible with
freesurfer?
Thank you.
Louis Dieumegarde
Data scientist / Professionnel de recherche
Laboratoire Medics
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 14:03:52 -0400
From: "Vladimir S. FONOV" <vladimir.fonov at gmail.com>
To: MINC users mailing list <minc-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca>
Subject: Re: [MINC-users] mincnlm
Message-ID:
<CAMCwi7NprkytegKbFRa2eKYaMwJgV5tCDQJeJkeTZ5twhhCtdA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hello,
Try converting it to float before running minnlm (i.e mincreshape -float
<in> <out> )
On 16 May 2018 at 14:01, Louis Dieumegarde <
louis.dieumegarde at crulrg.ulaval.ca> wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
>
> We have a problem when using the mincnlm tool with mri_convert. Once
> the denoised minc file is convert to MGZ, we have an intensity range of
> -32768 to 32767.
>
>
> I tried the no_scale flag without success. I tried the -odt flag, the
> range become 0-255, but there is still the wide disparity between some
> voxels in the lower vs upper range.
>
>
> The denoised minc is ok when we use register or mincstats. Even when we
> open directly the denoised minc in freeview, the problem appears.
>
>
> Is there a conversion in the denoised tool that is not compatible with
> freesurfer?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Louis Dieumegarde
>
> Data scientist / Professionnel de recherche
>
> Laboratoire Medics
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir S. Fonov ~ vladimir <dot> fonov <at> gmail <dot> com
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
MINC-users mailing list
MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
End of MINC-users Digest, Vol 151, Issue 1
******************************************
More information about the MINC-users
mailing list