[MINC-users] Co-registration metric (minctracc)

[Paul GRAVEL]

Many thanks Andrew!

I gave it a try, and it looks promising!
btw, is there a way to floor each volume with different values?

Best,

Paul


On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Andrew Janke wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Yes the output of minctracc should be able to help you. Just be aware
> that if you are running minctracc within something else (nlpfit,
> mritotal, etc) in which step sizes and other things change that the
> correlation will also change.
>
> You might also be interested in minccmp,  I added it some time ago for
> this express purpose.
>
>
> a
>
>
> On 29 January 2016 at 05:38, Paul GRAVEL <pgravel at bic.mni.mcgill.ca> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Hope all is well!
>>
>> Is there a metric (or metrics) to test the goodness of co-registration with
>> minctracc (would that be comparing the Initial objective function val vs.
>> Final objective function value)?
>>
>> The reason for this question is that I am running a script that does 2
>> passes of a PET to PET co-registration, but sometimes the second pass messes
>> things up, especially when the first pass looks good.
>> Thus I would like to use this metric to automatically check whether or not
>> the second pass should be run at all.
>> Of course, I would still visually inspect the end results ;-)!
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
>> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>