[MINC-users] Problems with volume/slice normalization and labels
Gabriel A. Devenyi
gdevenyi at gmail.com
Sat Feb 20 16:36:34 EST 2016
Thanks Vlad, we've moved to itk_resample for our transforms previously on
your recommendation.
--
Gabriel A. Devenyi B.Eng. Ph.D.
Research Computing Associate
Computational Brain Anatomy Laboratory
Cerebral Imaging Center
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
McGill University
t: 514.761.6131x4781
e: gdevenyi at gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Vladimir S. FONOV <vladimir.fonov at gmail.com
> wrote:
> itk_resample --labels <in> <out> --like <template> --transform
> <transform.xfm> for resampling
>
> or, after running any standard minc tool (minccalc, mincmath, etc )
>
> mincreshape -valid_range 0 X -image_range 0 X <in> <out>
>
> where X in you maximum label id
>
> On 16-02-16 12:09 PM, Gabriel A. Devenyi wrote:
>
>> Hi minc-users,
>>
>> I have some labels that via some step in minc-toolkit had an introduction
>> of volume and/or slice-selective normalization.
>>
>> This is causing serious issues *sometimes* in some processing.
>>
>> Can anyone recommend a way to successfully strip away all the
>> normalization
>> from the file so they are true labels?
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Vladimir S. FONOV ~ vladimir.fonov <at> gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>
More information about the MINC-users
mailing list