[MINC-users] dcm2mnc bug (?)

Alex Zijdenbos zijdenbos at gmail.com
Thu Mar 15 10:36:02 EDT 2012


> I am sure that the older version didn't take much notice of frame
> names or times and just concatenated every one it sees into the output
> (4D) file. The difference is that the new version started checking,
> again if memory serves correctly this was to deal with diffusion
> images.
>
> If you use dcmdump do the time frames have differing ID's or time codes?

Yes, 'FrameReferenceTime' has four different values in the set of
slices (presumably corresponding to the 4 different time frames that
the 'old' converter generated).

> I am also assuming you've tried "-splitdynamic"?

Yes, no difference

-- A


More information about the MINC-users mailing list