[MINC-users] MINC and ITK

Michel Audette michel.audette at kitware.com
Fri Jun 3 13:03:52 EDT 2011


Hi Leila,

just checking whether you've discussed this on the ITK users list. If you
need help with the Insight Journal entry, which is the usual method for ITK
acceptance, let me know.

Best wishes,

Michel

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Leila Baghdadi
<baghdadi at phenogenomics.ca>wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Leila Baghdadi <baghdadi at phenogenomics.ca>
> Sent: Fri, 6/3/2011 12:00pm
> To: MINC development discussion & planning <
> minc-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca>
> Subject: Re: [MINC-development] MINC and ITK
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just thought of sending an update to the minc community regarding support
> for MINC in ITK.
>
> My code (ITKMINC2IO) (originally written in 2008 and not maintained, blame
> it on maternity leave(s)!), can only support MINC2 files and right now
> requires work as various things have changed in ITK since then,
>
> I am in the process of rewriting some parts of the above, and will resubmit
> a new version to the ITK-journal once I have it completed! (I do want to
> resubmit this code as it makes exclusive minc2 api calls )
>
> meanwhile,
>
> The code of Vladimir (EZminc), can read both formats and is much more
> up-to-date,
>
> Please send me any questions or concerns
>
> Leila
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andrew Janke <a.janke at gmail.com>
> Sent: Sun, 5/15/2011 8:29pm
> To: MINC development discussion & planning <
> minc-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca>
> Subject: Re: [MINC-development] MINC and ITK
>
> > That's my understanding as well - we (us Toronto folks, that is), seem to
> be the happiest in the MINC community to discard MINC1 compatibility,
>
> Pick me too!  I have been MINC2 only for at least the last 3 years,
> the impending MINC2.2 release will finally drive the final nail in the
> MINC1 coffin. The default will be to write out MINC2 files
> irrespective of what the input was.  I don't plan to add a -1 flag to
> all the binaries to write out MINC1 and instead will only add a -1
> flag to mincconvert for the sticklers.
>
> For those asking why, I have had requests for this from users none of
> whom were from the BIC!  Perhaps I should open a separate thread about
> this on minc-dev but expect to see my commits for this on github
> shortly.
>
>
> a
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-development mailing list
> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-development mailing list
> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>



-- 
Michel Audette, Ph.D.
R & D Engineer,
Kitware Inc.,
Chapel Hill, N.C.


More information about the MINC-users mailing list