[MINC-users] mincresample of negative zsteps
Soren Christensen
sorench at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 02:21:43 EDT 2010
Thanks Andrew,
I just bumped into another issue with mincresample this afternoon - this
time with ordinary positive zsteps:
Shouldn't the resampled file below get a zstep of 4? what could be the
reason it becomes 3.74669 only?
mincinfo roi_no_header.mnc
file: roi_no_header.mnc
image: unsigned byte 0 to 255
image dimensions: zspace yspace xspace
dimension name length step start
-------------- ------ ---- -----
zspace 9 unknown unknown
yspace 512 unknown unknown
xspace 512 unknown unknown
mincinfo template.mnc
file: template.mnc
image: unsigned short 0 to 65535
image dimensions: zspace yspace xspace
dimension name length step start
-------------- ------ ---- -----
zspace 9 4 -513.102
yspace 512 -0.40625 102.84
xspace 512 -0.40625 103.797
mincresample -like template.mnc -nearest roi_no_header.mnc
roi_l_template.mnc
file: roi_l_template.mnc
image: unsigned byte 0 to 255
image dimensions: zspace yspace xspace
dimension name length step start
-------------- ------ ---- -----
zspace 9 3.74669 -513.102
yspace 512 -0.40625 102.84
xspace 512 -0.40625 103.797
Cheers
Soren
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Janke <a.janke at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think so ( in this case). Peter oroginally made a distinction
> between the slice and in-plane dimensions for reasons known to him. I
> think a lot of the reason was around slice scaling of image ranges.
>
> In any case it can sometimes make for some interesting (and at times)
> unexpected results. :(
>
>
> a
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 14:48, Soren Christensen <sorench at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am not sure where the problem arises (is it that zspace is my slowest
> > varying dim and the -1 you allude to?)
> >
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>
More information about the MINC-users
mailing list