[MINC-users] mincbet

[Vladimir S. Fonov]

Hello,

Jon Erik Ween wrote:
> That was an issue, but has been corrected. I get the same problems  
> with mincbet whether or not I change the header parameter and/or  
> resample the volume with regular -dimsize. Actually, I seem to get  
> better results by just changing the header and not reshaping the  
> volume, but that's probably not the correct way to go about things. Is  
> there another such parameter that might be off? I've tried comparing  
> mincheader with a "good" scan, but there are so many differences that  
> it's hard to know which are significant.

You can also try to normalize the whole intensity range after nu_correct 
to something standard, like 0-100. For example you can calculate 99.8th 
percentile with mincstats -pctT 99.8 your_file.mnc and then use it to 
normalize intensities.
-- 
Best regards,
  Vladimir S. Fonov ~ vladimir.fonov <at> gmail.com