[MINC-users] MINC to DICOM

[Alex Zijdenbos]

>> is simply not realistic. However, I suspect that a mnc2dcm that would attain
>>
>>  <minc> == dcm2mnc( mnc2dcm( <minc> ) )
>>
>> is much more feasible (by the way, I don't believe that you can do the
>
> Not as feasible as you seem to think, IMO:

Should I mention that you were the one that suggested this to me some
time ago? :)

> Obviously an intermediate case
> exists, and it is only a question of defining which elements and
> attributes are used in the mapping - but this "only" is an ugly job
> fraught with disagreement - as was also my original statement.

Well - this is exactly the way dcm2mnc, nii2mnc, mnc2nii, and probably
other existing converters already work, and people seem to be pretty
happy with them in general...

> Defense rests ;)

Indeed

-- A