[MINC-users] minc 2.0.16?

[Andrew Janke]

The answer to this is "soon". :(  I had been working on changes such
that the "2.0.16' release was actually going to be 2.1.0 in which the
default output type is a MINC2 file. This means that there are  a lot
of small changes needed to a lot of files. (adding a -1 option for
example!).

I could always release 2.0.16 without all these changes.  I will add
this to tonights list of jobs.


a

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Alex Zijdenbos <alex at bic.mni.mcgill.ca> wrote:
> While on the topic of conversions: are there any plans to release minc
> 2.0.16 anytime soon?
>
> It appears that (at least) the 64-bit build of dcm2mnc from
> minc-2.0.15 is not able to convert (or even recognize) quite a bit of
> dicom data; but I built the version currently in CVS and that seems to
> work flawlessly. Could be due to the fixes that Claude put in for
> 64-bit compatibility, I don't know, but either way, it would be good
> to get a working dcm2mnc out there (plus other fixes/additions).
>
> -- A
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www2.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>



-- 
Andrew Janke - andrew.janke at anu.edu.au
Department of Geriatric Medicine, ANU
(a.janke at gmail.com || http://a.janke.googlepages.com/)
Canberra->Australia    +61 (402) 700 883