[MINC-users] cortical thickness normalization
Morgan Hough
mhough at fmrib.ox.ac.uk
Thu Jan 10 11:02:46 EST 2008
Hi there,
I just wanted to see if anyone remembers the HBM abstract that Bruce is
referring to here regarding cortical thickness normalization. Does
anyone have a different opinion on this matter? Thanks in advance for
your time.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Re: [Freesurfer] cortical thickness normalization
Bruce Fischl
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:21:28 -0800
Hi Paul,
I think volume you can normalize with eTIV, but how to normalize
thickness is an open question. You could argue it should be eTIV^(1/3),
but I know at least one HBM abstract a couple of years ago from the MNI
showing that you shouldn't normalize at all. If your effects are focal
then normalizing by avg thickness is reasonable, or maybe the average of
some region that you expect to be unaffected?
cheers,
Bruce
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Paul Greenberg wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
When comparing cortical gray matter volumes between groups it is
appropriate to normalize subject's mean cortical volume in each
cortical parcellation by their eTIV. Is there a corresponding value
appropriate for normalizing cortical thickness? Would mean cortical
thickness for a single hemisphere be an appropriate normalization
factor? We are interested in comparing cortical thickness between a
control group and a group of people with a degenerative brain disease.
Thanks very much,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Morgan Hough, D. Phil. Student, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222466 (fax 222717)
mhough at fmrib.ox.ac.uk http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~mhough
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the MINC-users
mailing list