[MINC-users] EMMA for MINC 2.x

[Jason Lerch]

Doing matrix work in R can be a bit tedious - so if I have my K space 
data and want to fourier transform it, matlab will be a lot friendlier, 
I think. So I don't know if R can ever replace matlab for some things.

That being said, there is a MINC interface in R already, and it too is 
under active development.

Jason

EJ Nikelski wrote:
> Hi Andrew (and List),
>
>    I would very much support the move away from Matlab, however in the
> past I have found Octave project development to be very inconsistent.
> The R-project, on the other hand, is under extremely active
> development. Would R not be a reasonable replacement?
>
> -Jim
>
>
>   
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Not sure if anyone replied to this, so here goes.
>>
>> This is certainly something that is on my big list of things to do but
>> unfortunately it is not all that high up as of yet.
>>
>> I realise that good MATLAB integration is a big hole in MINC but I
>> dont have much time to work on it as I dont have a machine with MATLAB
>> on it at my disposal.
>>
>> What I did plan instead was a Octave MINC interface but would need a
>> show of support before embarking on such a project.
>>
>>
>> a
>>
>> On 9/18/07, Dan Nesbitt <dnesbitt at pet.ubc.ca> wrote:
>>     
>>> I was wondering if anyone is working on porting EMMA to MINC 2.x?
>>>
>>> It looks like from the source code that EMMA uses some NetCDF
>>> definitions and library calls that would require some effort to port to
>>> MINC 2.x (w/HDF5).
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
>> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>>
>>     
>
>
>