[MINC-users] MINC 2.0.13 - windows

[Rupert Brooks]

Cool, sounds like exactly what i wanted to hear :-)

Ultimately where i want to get to is to have binarys for all the basic
minctools, and ideally register as well, maybe display.

Since it sounds like I need more than what you have compiled so far, i
guess i would be most interested in the "how you did it" document.
That would probably save me having to ask you again on the next
release and so forth.  Failing that, i'll take the minc2.dll and the
tools you have built.

Thanks!
Rupert


On 10/10/07, Penhune Lab <penhunelab at gmail.com> wrote:
> i already compiled minc 2.0.13 using visual studio 2003. the thing is i only
> compiled the main library (minc2.dll), mincinfo, mincresample and
> mincreshape
>
> If you need any of those let me know. if you need anything else i don't
> think i have the time to set that up right now. I'm writing instructions on
> how to run a basic fmri analysis under windows natively (i don't like
> cygwin) so i still have to port a couple more things (like mritotal). i
> finished porting fmr_preprocess and the mni_autoreg tools just in case you
> need them too.
>
> I will we posting a website on how to install everything under windows
> hopefully sooner rather than later.
>
> ps. i think i wrote a document for myself about the necessary settings
> (trial and error + a little intuition) to compile minc in visual studio. let
> me know if you're interested on that too
>
> Alejandro Endo
>
> On 10/10/07, Rupert Brooks <rupe.brooks at gmail.com> wrote:
> > hi people,
> >
> > I've been using Leila Bagdadis Windows binaries of minc 2.0.09 for a
> > while now.  Its high time for me to upgrade, mainly for compatibility
> > with the  MINC reader in ITK3.4 (in the Review section).
> >
> > What is particularly important to me is to be able to link against it
> > with Visual C++.  It doesnt seem easy to get cygwin or mingw to take
> > me down this road.  Has anyone done this?
> >
> > My main questions are - how were these binaries built?   They seem to
> > have been built with VC++7, and i suppose that means that Microsoft's
> > Posix compatibility layer was used.  But this is a total guess based
> > on running strings against the binary.  Does anyone plan to build a
> > set of these soon (Leila??) ?
> >
> > Anyway, if no one has plans to build a set, I don't mind building it,
> > but a few pointers as to where to start would be very helpful.
> >
> > cheers
> > Rupert  B.
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Rupert Brooks
> > McGill Centre for Intelligent Machines (www.cim.mcgill.ca)
> > Ph.D Student, Electrical and Computer Engineering
> > http://www.cyberus.ca/~rbrooks
> > _______________________________________________
> > MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> > http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
> >
>
>
> --
> Laboratory for Motor Learning and Neural Plasticity
> Directed by Dr. Virginia Penhune
> Department of Psychology, Concordia University
> SP-A 244, 7141 Sherbrooke St. W
> Montreal, QC  H4B 1R6  Canada
> (514)848-2424 ext. 7567
> http://psychology.concordia.ca/fac/penhune/winindex.html
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Rupert Brooks
McGill Centre for Intelligent Machines (www.cim.mcgill.ca)
Ph.D Student, Electrical and Computer Engineering
http://www.cyberus.ca/~rbrooks