[MINC-development] "Amusing" mincblur issue...

[Andrew Janke]

Thanks Steve,

Given that this was a revert of Claudes original changes (that I
committed) I was sort of waiting for a corroboration that what I had
done was "right".  In any case given that we both now get the same
result it would seem high time to release 2.0.17 and get this tested
in a few more places before other things break.

I will also do a few commits for the latest EBTKS + N3 + latest
gcc/libc + C++ problems that rear their heads on Ubuntu Intrepid and
Debian testing. (I forget the current release name). Oh how I love old
C++ code.....   (it currently barfs during the N3 build although it is
really a problem in EBTKS).


a

Steve M. Robbins <steve at sumost.ca>:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:07:42AM +1100, Andrew Janke wrote:
>> Hrm, seems like this is more endemic than I originally thought...
>
> It just bit me trying to use rawtominc.
>
> Amusingly, your proposed change exactly undoes revision 6.9 of
> ParseArgv.c -- which was done this summer as part of 'large number of
> changes from Claude (64 bit and updates)'.
>
> I used your test code to create a new unit test (test_arg_parse.c and
> run_test_arg_parse.sh) which exhibits the bug.  Then I reverted change
> 6.9 of ParseArgv.c and the new tests pass.  I think the code is now
> correct, but it would be good for you and Claude to have a look to see
> whether change 6.9 was fixing a problem and, if so, to augment
> test_arg_parse.c.
>
> I did a few other minor cleanups, including bumping to revision
> 2.0.17.