[MINC-development] [geeks] MINC 2.0 debian packages.

[Jason Lerch]

On 6-Aug-06, at 6:12 PM, Andrew Janke wrote:

> On 8/6/06, Jonathan LAU <lau at bic.mni.mcgill.ca> wrote:
>> The bic suffix is a bit confusing to me but I guess it's something  
>> we'll all
>> have to just get used to.  Is there a reason for not using "minc2"  
>> itself as
>> the suffix instead ( i.e. /usr/local/minc2/)?  That seems more
>> self-explanatory to me.

The intel-mac distro uses /usr/local/minc2 already, and I think  
keeping the 2 for the moment is great - at least for as long as  
people expect to be able to install both minc1 and 2 based software  
(I don't know why they would, but hey).

Jason

>
> Sounds like a grand plan, seems that we all missed the obvious.
> (/usr/local/bic was Sylvains brainwave BTW).
>
> I say we go even simpler and use /usr/local/minc, I will rebuild them
> all using /usr/local/minc before public release.
>
> I have an aversion to adding a "2" to the end of things when you
> upgrade. I dislike this if only because then what do you do when you
> release version 3?
>
>
> a.