[Loris-dev] question regarding visit labels

[Ling Ma]

Hi Ioannis,

1) The Image Uploader's Visit labels are those already existed, populated
from session table. While <visitLabel> session is used to create a
visitLabel which you could use to generate a timepoints, then the
visitLabel might be visible in image uploader.
2). The mri_protocol min, max specifications are not used to identify the
violations, the violations could be flag only if the protocol is unknown.

Best regards,
Ling Ma
Dev consultant

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:41 PM Ioannis Pappas <ioannis at berkeley.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Loris support.
> I hope you are well. I m using Loris version 21.0.1. I have two questions
> if you allow me. 1) First I am trying to manually define my visit labels
> like this in project/config.xml
>
> <visitLabel subprojectID="1">
>             <generation>sequence</generation>
>             <regex>/^[A-Z0-9]{2}$/i</regex>
>             <length>2</length>
>             <suggest>V%value%</suggest>
>             <labelSet>
>                 <item value="V1">V01</item>
>                 <item value="V2">V02</item>
>                 <item value="V3">V03</item>
>             </labelSet>
> </visitLabel>
>
> which is very similar to the one you provide in the documentation
>
>   <visitLabel subprojectID="1">
>       <generation>sequence</generation>
>       <regex>/^[A-Z0-9]{2}$/i</regex>
>       <length>2</length>
>       <suggest>V%value%</suggest>       <!--  %value% will be substituted
> for the next unique number  -->
>       <labelSet>
>           <item value="V1">V1 label description</item>
>           <item value="V2">V2 label description</tem>
>       </labelSet>
>    </visitLabel>
>
> However when I am trying to experiment and upload a scan (e.g. via the
> Imaging Uploader gui) the values don't show up in the dropdown box for the
> visit labels. Am I doing something foolish and wrong?
>
> 2) From my understanding the uploaded scans will be automatically
> identified (in terms of whether this is t1,t2,or flair for example) via the
> min and max specifications in the mri_protocol table (that is further
> connected to the mri_scan_type table). Is this correct? Subsequently any
> violations will be defined based on these bounds.
>
> Best wishes,
> Ioannis
> _______________________________________________
> Loris-dev mailing list
> Loris-dev at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> https://mailman.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/loris-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/pipermail/loris-dev/attachments/20200220/b4a91219/attachment.html>