[MINC-users] mincresample -like bug?
Alex Zijdenbos
zijdenbos at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 23:29:33 EDT 2015
I seem to have stumbled into something unusual: a failure of mincresample.
[by the way, according to the GMail spell checker, the correct spelling of
'mincresample' is 'creaminess'. duh.]
Anyways, I have this:
$ mincinfo in.mnc <https://www.dropbox.com/s/dwaz0ftbtefsfz7/in.mnc?dl=0>
model.mnc <https://www.dropbox.com/s/ic41vwursndyonj/model.mnc?dl=0>
file: in.mnc
image: unsigned short 0 to 65535
image dimensions: zspace yspace xspace
dimension name length step start
-------------- ------ ---- -----
zspace 96 2 -321.707
yspace 134 2 -202.414
xspace 134 2 -132.414
file: model.mnc
image: signed__ short -32768 to 32767
image dimensions: zspace yspace xspace
dimension name length step start
-------------- ------ ---- -----
zspace 94 2 -319.707
yspace 132 2 -200.414
xspace 132 2 -130.414
Now I resample in.mnc like model.mnc:
$ mincresample -like model.mnc in.mnc res.mnc
Transforming
slices:..............................................................................................Done
$ mincinfo res.mnc
file: res.mnc
image: unsigned short 0 to 65535
image dimensions: zspace yspace xspace
dimension name length step start
-------------- ------ ---- -----
zspace 94 1 0
yspace 132 2 -200.414
xspace 132 2 -130.414
Clearly, the zspace step and start of the resampled volume (yellow) don't
look at all like those of the -like volume (green). I suspect a numerical
precision issue causing the start/step calculation to go wrong, but I'm not
sure.
In case anybody wants to play, you can get in.mnc and model.mnc from the
URLs in the first mincinfo call.
-- A
More information about the MINC-users
mailing list