[MINC-users] Latest stable version of packages

Gabriel A. Devenyi gdevenyi at gmail.com
Tue Apr 28 16:12:35 EDT 2015


Hi Vlad?

How often are there "releases" of minc-toolkit? We prefer to quarantine our
software versions (a la SciNet with environment-modules). As such, we
usually want to build versioned releases. I could do it via git tags, but
that will result in a proliferation of a large number of different versions.

How many commits have happened since 1.0.04?

-- 
Gabriel A. Devenyi B.Eng. Ph.D.
Research Computing Associate
Computational Brain Anatomy Laboratory
Cerebral Imaging Center
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
McGill University
t: 514.761.6131x4781
e: gdevenyi at gmail.com

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Vladimir S. FONOV <vladimir.fonov at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The most reliable way currently, would be to take master branch of
> minc-toolkit and use underlying packages.
>
>
> On 15-04-28 03:48 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This question refers specifically to mni_autoreg, but it's about minc
>> packages in general.
>>
>> The latest release of mni_autoreg is 0.99.60 (according to the tags in
>> BIC-MNI/mni_autoreg on github), but there have been many minc-toolkit
>> releases using commits from after the 0.99.60 tag.
>>
>> I'm wondering how to determine the most recent blessed version of minc
>> packages. It appears that the tags in the packages themselves shouldn't be
>> trusted (or perhaps this is unique to mni_autoreg).
>>
>> It looks to me like the packages all released in lockstep, each time
>> minc-toolkit is tagged. Could someone please confirm?
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>  Vladimir S. FONOV ~ vladimir.fonov <at> gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>


More information about the MINC-users mailing list