[MINC-users] upet2mnc with CT images

[Andrew Janke]

Hi John,

I don't have much to do with upet data so can't really comment on this
much beyond to say that what you are suggesting makes sense to me.

If you are a github user you could always fork from here:

   https://github.com/andrewjanke/minc/tree/master/conversion/micropet

and see how this change works out for you?  If it goes well I dont see
any reason as to why we shouldn't bring this change back into MINC
itself.

Thanks


a

On 30 July 2011 01:42,  <jcupitt at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using upet2mnc to read PET scans with success, but I can't read
> the accompanying CT image.
>
> Looking at upet2mnc.c it seems to assume that both calibration_factor
> and isotope_branching_fraction will be set for all images, but of
> course the CT will not have these two fields.
>
> How are people converting upet CT images to mnc? Is there some other
> tool I should use?
>
> Alternatively, should calibration_factor and
> isotope_branching_fraction default to 1.0? That would fix the problem,
> I think (untested).
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users
>