[MINC-users] compiling dyld, 32, 64?

[Alexandre CARMEL-VEILLEUX]

On the CMake front, after much fighting with it, I find that I abhor it
and its insistance at wrapping everything in a config file / menu
system. I find it very opaque as it insists in implementing its world
view on the whole build process. But maybe I just haven't seen the light
and my liking the simplicity (or clarity?) of Makefiles.

Alex

On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:23:17AM +1100, Andrew Janke wrote:
> > Or, ideally/long term, ditch the entire auto* tool chain in favour of
> > CMake (http://www.cmake.org) which can properly configure/build for Mac,
> > Linux, and Windows.
> 
> But as of yet has very primitive packaging and dist file generation.
> (CPack). It seems primarily aimed at those who are installing binaries
> as opposed to libraries + binaries using things like libtool.
> 
> >  And it properly handles Universal Binaries.  MINC2
> > has some support for CMake, but I don't think it's complete.
> 
> Correct, there is a CMakeLists.txt in minc itself that I do keep up to
> date but that is as far as I got a yonk ago.
> 
> 
> --
> Andrew Janke
> (a.janke at gmail.com || http://a.janke.googlepages.com/)
> Canberra->Australia    +61 (402) 700 883
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-users at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www2.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-users