[MINC-users] Minc 1.5.1 64-bit compatibility bug

[Alexandre CARMEL-VEILLEUX]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:33:57PM -0400, Claude LEPAGE wrote:
> 
> Shouldn't rawtominc.c use ARGV_STRING instead of ARGV_CONSTANT? These
> are strings, not integers.

	ARGV_STRING expects that the next argument on the command-line
should be a string. -mri is only a flag and doesn't expect an argument.

The ParseArgv man page states:

       ARGV_STRING
              In  this  form,  dst  is  treated  as  a  pointer to a (char *);
              ParseArgv stores at *dst a pointer to  the  following  argument,
              and  discards  the  matching  and following arguments from argv.
              Src is treated as an integer count: if its value is greater than
              1,  then that many arguments are processed and Dst is treated as
              an array pointer.

Alex