[MINC-users] MacOS packages faulty?

[Andrew Janke]

Hi Paul (and others)

I recompiled a bunch of them last night under 10.4 there were a few
small tweaks that were needed for POSIX compliance but by en large
things progressed smoothly.  For the packages that require external
libraries (bicpl and netpbm for example) I have used the fink
versions.  In the future I may use darwinports as it seems a bit
"cleaner" but at the moment I am unconvinced either way.

Could those who use tiger please test the new packages here:

   http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx-10.4/

Note that this is not a complete list (some failed for various reasons
that I will try to rectify over the next few days).


Andrew


On 4/3/06, Paul Rasser <Paul.Rasser at newcastle.edu.au> wrote:
> Just wondering how things are progressing regarding the Mac OS packages?
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
>
> >>> Paul.Rasser at newcastle.edu.au 03/07/06 4:33 PM >>>
> Both the packages below failed to install on 10.4.4
>
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/display-1.4.0.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/display-1.4.1.pkg.tar.gz
>
>
> Paul.
>
> >>> dale at bic.mni.mcgill.ca 02/25/06 1:47 PM >>>
> Hello,
>     I am displease to inform you all that I believe the packages listed
> below to be faulty...    Since I do not have a 10.4 system I will need
> a volunteer.  Someone with a MacOS 10.4 system;  download and install
> anyone of them  if it fails there are all probably broken.
>
> Please be careful to read the error message at the end!!!
>
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/classify-1.0.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/display-1.4.0.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/display-1.4.1.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/glim-image-1.1.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/inormalize-0.99.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/mincblob-1.2.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/mni-autoreg-0.98s.pkg.tar.gz
> http://packages.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/osx/register-1.3.6.pkg.tar.gz
>
>
> NOTE:  It looks like they have been broken for a while.  Even the ones
> on my backup from a month-ago are bad.   They look to have been
> corrupted in the transfer.
>
> I am sorry for the pain this may have cause.  I will try to have it
> rectified shortly.

--
Andrew Janke      (a.janke at gmail.com || www.cmr.uq.edu.au/~rotor)
Canada->Montreal                                   Cell: +1 (514) 924 2012