[MINC-users] 0.3 vs 1.0 scaling - clarifications

[James Dessart]

On Friday, May 16, 2003, at 09:00  AM, Steve ROBBINS wrote:

>>> If it is of an integer type (NC_BYTE,
>>> NC_SHORT), then the old behaviour should still apply.
>>
>> Actually, the file is NC_SHORT data,
>
> I believe Peter was referring to the data type IN MEMORY, which may
> be different than the type on disk.

Ah, well it's being read in as NC_BYTE, so I still don't know why it's 
normalizing when I've even explicitly told it not to...

Thanks,
James Dessart
Rogue Research Inc.