[MINC-development] MINC with NetCDF 4.4?
Robert D. Vincent
robert.d.vincent at mcgill.ca
Fri Sep 11 15:29:25 EDT 2015
Hi all,
So the minc-tools and libminc projects are now merged and tagged, both at
2.3.00. "Develop" should now be even with "master."
Please check my work and make certain I haven't screwed up anything.
-bert
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Robert D. Vincent <
robert.d.vincent at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> Ahh, I see, I need to build completely outside of the source tree...
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Vladimir S. FONOV <
> vladimir.fonov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do you build in separate directory?
>>
>> On 15-09-11 12:19 PM, Robert D. Vincent wrote:
>>
>>> I've done the merge for libminc, but I'm finding that the either my
>>> brain or the CPack packaging appears to be dysfunctional. I can't get a
>>> clean source tarball that doesn't include all of the build junk. Any
>>> clues?
>>>
>>> -bert
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Andrew Janke <a.janke at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:a.janke at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> minc-tools develop is fine for merge to master last I looked. The
>>> only thing I haven't checked is if all remanants of automake and
>>> autoconf have been removed.
>>>
>>> there should be two archives in their respective github trees from
>>> my perspective.
>>>
>>> a
>>>
>>> On 11/09/2015 2:26 pm, "Robert D. Vincent"
>>> <robert.d.vincent at mcgill.ca <mailto:robert.d.vincent at mcgill.ca>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> I can try to make an official tarball asap. For Debian packaging
>>> purposes, can you handle separate tarballs for libminc and
>>> minc-tools?
>>>
>>> -bert
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Steve M. Robbins
>>> <steve at sumost.ca <mailto:steve at sumost.ca>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On August 24, 2015 07:18:09 PM Robert D. Vincent wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I've fixed the issue with netCDF 4.4 and checked the fix
>>> into the develop
>>> > branch.
>>> >
>>> > I agree that we should do an official release of the minc
>>> libraries and
>>> > tools.
>>>
>>> Andrew fixed up the minc-tools version number. Things look
>>> pretty good to me!
>>> Should we expect a merge to master and a release anytime
>>> soon? If not, I can
>>> take a snapshot of develop to package in Debian. But if an
>>> official tarball is
>>> immanent: I can hold off for a bit.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MINC-development mailing list
>>> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
>>> <mailto:MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MINC-development mailing list
>>> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
>>> <mailto:MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca>
>>> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MINC-development mailing list
>>> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
>>> <mailto:MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca>
>>> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MINC-development mailing list
>>> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
>>> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Vladimir S. FONOV ~ vladimir.fonov <at> gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MINC-development mailing list
>> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
>> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MINC-development mailing list
> MINC-development at bic.mni.mcgill.ca
> http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/mailman/listinfo/minc-development
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/pipermail/minc-development/attachments/20150911/dd073d9e/attachment.html>
More information about the MINC-development
mailing list